F1 x IndyCar: Who supports female drivers more?
The promotion of female racing drivers in F1 and IndyCar differs significantly in terms of opportunities, visibility, costs, and pathways to top-tier racing.
The general consensus seems to favor the path of IndyCar rather than Formula 1. It appears to be way easier for female drivers to secure a seat in the American series as well as be successful there. Let’s break down the reasons why.
Opportunities
In recent years, F1 has taken steps to increase female participation, notably with women-only feeder series such as the independent W Series and then later the F1 Academy, which is directly controlled by F1 and FIA. Nevertheless, opportunities for women to compete in F1 still remain limited.
Jamie Chadwick, a three-time W Series champion, has openly discussed how the W Series was instrumental in providing her opportunities in single-seaters, ultimately leading to her role at Williams as a development driver. Still, despite her success, Chadwick has struggled to transition not only into Formula 1 but into any of their feeder series as well.
While the W Series required no financial budget from the competitors, the F1 Academy somewhat relies on the money brought in by the drivers - the entry fee is € 100,000. Even though the series' Champion does get a fully-funded seat in Formula Regional, there is no real plan for how to integrate F1 Academy into the “official” F1 feeder series ladder system, so the opportunity to get into F1 is yet to be there.
IndyCar, on the other hand, has been more inclusive. Several women, such as Danica Patrick, Pippa Mann, Katherine Legge, and now Jamie Chadwick (currently doing her second season in Indy NXT, IndyCar's feeder series) have had opportunities to compete at higher levels. Chadwick herself is aiming for a full IndyCar seat by 2025, and has a high chance of achieving it.
Marketing of Female Drivers
F1’s promotion of their female drivers has been heavily criticized, and marked as minimal. For instance, the F1 Academy, which aims to develop talents among women, has received limited attention compared to other major F1 events. In fact, the first season wasn't televised until the last race weekend in Austin. This was also seen with the W Series, which gained a bit of momentum at the start, but lacked the promotional push needed to truly elevate women into the top ranks of F1.
Chadwick has mentioned that while her involvement in the W Series and Extreme E helped her career, the transition to F1 still appears to be a distant dream due to the insufficient promotion and opportunities.
A new rule in F1 Academy, starting this season, states that at least 1 driver from each team in the F1 Academy should be a part of an F1 team junior program. However, the female drivers who are a part of said academies have been observing F1 sessions from team garages, listening to radio communication, and taking part in media/marketing events. None of them actually behind the wheel during an FP1 session, even though there is no reason why they shouldn't get a chance. The involment of Formula 1 teams in their female juniors career's is scarce, heavily focused on marketing rather than real interest.
IndyCar does a better job in this area. Female drivers are marketed more visibly, and their stories are often integrated into broader narratives about the sport's diversity. Danica Patrick winning a race in 2008 was a major promotional moment. Jamie Chadwick’s recent Indy NXT victory, as well as subsequent promotion plans, have been widely covered and celebrated. IndyCar's more organic and widespread promotion of female drivers allows greater visibility, making the transition through the ranks smoother. You follow the driver throughout their racing journey, not just by them appearing on a team's social media account.
Costs of Junior Ranks
The costs of going through the junior ranks in motorsport are pretty significant. The financial barrier to entry is significantly higher in F1 compared to IndyCar. Formula 1’s junior categories, Formula 2 and Formula 3, require immense financial backing. Female drivers often struggle to secure sponsorships, and without sufficient funding, their progress stalls.
This proved to be a major hurdle for Chadwick. Despite her W Series success - and prize money - she has not managed to secure an F1 seat, mainly due to financial limitations. Being a member of a Williams academy didn't help her at all.
IndyCar’s ladder system, including Indy NXT, is less financially prohibitive. While securing sponsorship is still crucial, the overall costs are lower. This allows female drivers to climb the ranks with comparatively less financial strain. For example, Chadwick's current Indy NXT campaign has been financially well-supported, giving her a better chance at a potential IndyCar seat.
Lessons F1 can learn from IndyCar
F1 can undoubtedly learn a few lessons from IndyCar when it comes to promoting female talent. First, they could offer more affordable and accessible junior series to help female drivers progress. Additionally, better marketing visibility would attract more sponsorships and public interest, creating a more supportive environment for women to succeed.
In contrast, IndyCar's promotion of female drivers shows how embracing diversity through structured support systems and better media coverage can allow female racers to thrive in a competitive environment. F1 could benefit from adopting similar practices to ensure a more inclusive future. After all, Formula 1 is one of, if not the only motorsport series not to have a women on a grid in the last ten years.
Comments